Evaluation of rebound tonometry in non-human primates.

Gillian McLellan // Kaufman Lab // Publications // Apr 01 2011

PubMed ID: 21315069

Author(s): Elsmo EJ, Kiland JA, Kaufman PL, McLellan GJ. Evaluation of rebound tonometry in non-human primates. Exp Eye Res. 2011 Apr;92(4):268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 16. PMID 21315069

Journal: Experimental Eye Research, Volume 92, Issue 4, Apr 2011

To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer in cynomolgus macaques and to determine the effects of corneal thickness on measurements obtained by the TonoVet®. The anterior chambers of both eyes of anesthetized monkeys were cannulated with branched 23-G needles; one branch was connected to a vertically adjustable reservoir and the other to a pressure transducer. IOP was increased by 5 mmHg increments and then decreased by 10 mmHg decrements. IOP was measured using the TonoVet® at each increment and decrement by 2 independent observers and at every other increment and every decrement by a single observer using ‘minified’ Goldmann applanation tonometry. Central corneal thickness was measured with a PachPen(TM) ultrasonic pachymeter. TonoVet® readings correlated well with manometric IOP (slope = 0.972, r(2) coefficient = 0.955). No significant differences were observed when comparing eyes or operators; however there was a non-significant trend for TonoVet® readings taken in right eyes to be closer to manometric IOP than those taken in left eyes. The TonoVet® had a non-significant tendency to underestimate manometric IOP. TonoVet® readings obtained during the decremental phase of the experiment were significantly closer (p < 0.004) to manometric IOP than those obtained during the incremental phase. Central corneal thickness significantly increased (p < 0.0001) over the course of the experiment. The TonoVet® rebound tonometer is a reliable and accurate tool for the measurement of IOP in cynomolgus macaques. This tonometer has several advantages, including portability, ease of use, and brief contact with the corneal surface making topical anesthetics unnecessary.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.