Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale.

PubMed ID: 36249302

Author(s): Domalpally A, Barrett N, Reimers J, Blodi B. Comparison of ultra-widefield imaging and standard imaging in assessment of early treatment diabetic retinopathy severity scale. Ophthalmol Sci. 2021 May 26;1(2):100029. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100029. eCollection 2021 Jun. PMID 36249302

Journal: Ophthalmology Science, Volume 1, Issue 2, Jun 2021

PURPOSE To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system.

DESIGN Cross-sectional Study.

PARTICIPANTS Paired images from 192 eyes (189 participants) with diabetic retinopathy were included.

METHODS The ETDRS levels were determined by masked graders in 3 ways: standard 7-field imaging, UWF within the 7-field region (7-field UWF imaging), and the entire UWF image (global ETDRS imaging).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Percentage agreement between 7-field and UWF imaging for ETDRS levels.

RESULTS Of the 166 paired images evaluated, exact agreement was found in 48.8% of eyes between standard 7-field and 7-field UWF ETDRS levels with a weighted κ value of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.68). Agreement rates varied with DR severity and were least in early DR (30.8%) and moderate nonproliferative DR (26.5%) groups. In 156 eyes with 7-field UWF ETDRS and global UWF ETDRS levels, exact agreement was found in 143 eyes (92%), with a weighted κ value of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9-0.98). The peripheral lesions contributed to a higher DR severity in 8% and changed the eye to a proliferative DR level in 2%. Reproducibility of the 3 ETDRS evaluations was comparable with a weighted κ value of 0.57 with standard 7-field imaging, 0.65 with 7-field UWF imaging, and 0.60 with global ETDRS scale imaging.

CONCLUSIONS Moderate agreement was found in the ETDRS DR severity scale between standard 7-field and UWF imaging, indicating caution in interchanging data from the 2 methods. Both methods showed good reproducibility for clinical trial outcome of 2-step change. The global ETDRS scale provides a comprehensive score to incorporate peripheral changes into the ETDRS scale. The implications of the global scale on progression rate are yet to be determined.

© 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.