Author(s): Scott IU, Jackson GR, Quillen DA, Klein R, Liao J, Gardner TW. Effect of doxycycline vs placebo on retinal function and diabetic retinopathy progression in mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized proof-of-concept clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;132(9):1137-42. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1422. PMID 24969516
IMPORTANCE Microglia have been associated with inflammatory changes underlying diabetic retinopathy.
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether low-dose oral doxycycline monohydrate, a drug capable of inhibiting microglial activation, can improve or slow the deterioration of retinal function and whether it can induce regression or slow progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-masked, 24-month proof-of-concept clinical trial. We randomized 33 patients (from the Penn State Hershey Eye Center) with at least 1 eye with mild to moderate NPDR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study level 20-43) to doxycycline monohydrate, 50 mg/d, or daily placebo for 24 months.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean change at 24 months compared with baseline in the foveal sensitivity of matrix frequency-doubling perimetry in each treatment group. We also compared the 2 groups with respect to change from baseline to 24 months in functional variables (Humphrey photopic visual field testing using the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm 24-2 strategy, contrast sensitivity, dark adaptation, visual acuity, and quality of life) and anatomical variables (diabetic retinopathy severity level, area of retinal thickening, central subfield thickness on optical coherence tomography, and macular volume on optical coherence tomography).
RESULTS From baseline to month 24, no significant difference was detected between groups with respect to all visual function and anatomical outcomes assessed.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although a link between low-dose oral anti-inflammatory agents and subclinical improvement in inner retinal function has been suggested in patients with severe NPDR or non-high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy, the same association was not found in the present study of patients with mild to moderate NPDR. The different findings in the 2 patient populations may relate to a differential effect of doxycycline on different stages of diabetic retinal dysfunction, or the sample size of the present study may be too small to detect a treatment effect of doxycycline in patients with mild to moderate NPDR.