An evaluation of fundus photography and fundus autofluorescence in the diagnosis of cuticular drusen.

Kleins Lab // Publications // Mar 01 2016

PubMed ID: 26216869

Author(s): Høeg TB, Moldow B, Klein R, La Cour M, Klemp K, Erngaard D, Ellervik C, Buch H. An evaluation of fundus photography and fundus autofluorescence in the diagnosis of cuticular drusen. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;100(3):378-82. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307197. Epub 2015 Jul 27. PMID 26216869

Journal: The British Journal Of Ophthalmology, Volume 100, Issue 3, Mar 2016

PURPOSE To examine non-mydriatic fundus photography (FP) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) as alternative non-invasive imaging modalities to fluorescein angiography (FA) in the detection of cuticular drusen (CD).

METHODS Among 2953 adults from the Danish Rural Eye Study (DRES) with gradable FP, three study groups were selected: (1) All those with suspected CD without age-related macular degeneration (AMD) on FP, (2) all those with suspected CD with AMD on FP and (3) a randomly selected group with early AMD. Groups 1, 2 and 3 underwent FA and FAF and group 4 underwent FAF only as part of DRES CD substudy. Main outcome measures included percentage of correct positive and correct negative diagnoses, Cohen’s κ and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ (PABAK) coefficients of test and grader reliability.

RESULTS CD was correctly identified on FP 88.9% of the time and correctly identified as not being present 83.3% of the time. CD was correctly identified on FAF 62.0% of the time and correctly identified as not being present 100.0% of the time. Compared with FA, FP has a PABAK of 0.75 (0.60 to 1.5) and FAF a PABAK of 0.44 (0.23 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS FP is a promising, non-invasive substitute for FA in the diagnosis of CD. FAF was less reliable than FP to detect CD.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/