PubMed ID: 38446483
Author(s): Liu TYA, Shpigel J, Khan F, Smith K, Prichett L, Channa R, Kanbour S, Jones M, Abusamaan MS, Sidhaye A, Mathioudakis N, Wolf RM. Use of Diabetes Technologies and Retinopathy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0728. PMID 38446483
Journal: Jama Network Open, Volume 7, Issue 3, Mar 2024
IMPORTANCE Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of diabetes that can lead to vision loss. Outcomes of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pump use in DR are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE To assess the use of CGM, insulin pump, or both, and DR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study of adults with T1D in a tertiary diabetes center and ophthalmology center was conducted from 2013 to 2021, with data analysis performed from June 2022 to April 2023.
EXPOSURE Use of diabetes technologies, including insulin pump, CGM, and both CGM and insulin pump.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was development of DR or PDR. A secondary outcome was the progression of DR for patients in the longitudinal cohort. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed for development of DR and PDR and association with CGM and insulin pump use.
RESULTS A total of 550 adults with T1D were included (median age, 40 [IQR, 28-54] years; 54.4% female; 24.5% Black or African American; and 68.4% White), with a median duration of diabetes of 20 (IQR, 10-30) years, and median hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.8% (IQR, 7.0%-8.9%). Overall, 62.7% patients used CGM, 58.2% used an insulin pump, and 47.5% used both; 44% (244 of 550) of the participants had DR at any point during the study. On univariate analysis, CGM use was associated with lower odds of DR and PDR, and CGM with pump was associated with lower odds of PDR (all P < .05), compared with no CGM use. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, diabetes duration, microvascular and macrovascular complications, insurance type, and mean HbA1c, showed that CGM was associated with lower odds of DR (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.84; P = .008) and PDR (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; P = .004), compared with no CGM use. In the longitudinal analysis of participants without baseline PDR, 79 of 363 patients (21.8%) had progression of DR during the study.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of adults with T1D, CGM use was associated with lower odds of developing DR and PDR, even after adjusting for HbA1c. These findings suggest that CGM may be useful for diabetes management to mitigate risk for DR and PDR.